Trust

Ethics & assurance

信任、安全与负责任地使用 KeePass

合法使用、伦理、透明度、恶意软件澄清与用户责任。请结合 KeePass 官方安全文档阅读。

Ethical usage statement

KeePass amplifies operator capability. With that capability comes duty: protect master keys, disclose incidents transparently, and refuse to coerce users into unsafe shortcuts (shared master passwords, unaudited plugins, or unsigned binaries). Security teams should pair KeePass deployments with user education; see plugin governance in Guides.

Open-source transparency

KeePass source code, translation packs, and cryptographic discussions are published alongside community mirrors such as SourceForge, where download telemetry and review history remain visible. Transparency does not eliminate risk: it enables stakeholders to perform independent verification - hash validation, signature checks, and code review - before relying on the software for high-value secrets.

Plugins extend functionality but are authored by third parties; transparency varies per project. Demand publication of source archives or vendor SBOM equivalents before granting enterprise deployment.

No malware clarification

Official KeePass releases from Dominik Reichl are not trojanized password stealers. Antivirus alerts typically indicate behavioral overlap (auto-type, compressed binaries) or user-installed plugins with aggressive hooks. If a binary fails OpenPGP verification or deviates from published hashes, treat it as compromised - do not run it.

User responsibility disclaimer

You remain solely responsible for backups, key management, incident response, and regulatory compliance. This material is provided “as is” without warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. When in doubt, consult attorneys, internal security architecture boards, and the official KeePass maintainer channels.

下载